As every bookworm knows … there comes a time when one must consciously uncouple from a book and promptly yeet it out of the window. Metaphorically speaking.
A CURSE SO DARK AND LONELY
YA books and I don’t have the best relationship. It’s not them, it’s me. I experienced a lot of dissonance with the characters, the plots, and the writing. (The binding, the front cover designs, the blurbs and the fonts are usually on point though.)
I DNF-d A Curse So Dark And Lonely because frankly I was bored. (I usually am loathe to admit boredom. ‘Only boring people get bored’ I used to tell myself smugly. Oh how the turntables have …) I didn’t care about the characters. The plot felt like porridge with no honey. Bread with no butter! English breakfast tea with no milk! I didn’t connect with the novel, and so therefore, reading it was a struggle.
It seems to have been a well-received book, but unfortunately, I couldn’t quite get it. And that’s okay! Different readers have different tastes, and perhaps if I tried again, I might like it.
MERCY & EAGLEFLIGHT
Christian fiction … ah, yes. Christian fiction. When done well, it is wonderful and brilliant (hello there! C.S Lewis!) when it is done badly … I refuse to accept that Christian fiction should be given a pass just because someone has slapped a label on it and marked it as ‘Christian’.
(If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and swims like a duck IT WILL NOT SUDDENLY TURN INTO A CAMEL OF BRILLIANCE IF YOU JUST PLONK A ‘CHRISTIAN’ LABEL ON IT.)
(That was a metaphor. The duck was bad fiction. The camel of brilliance was a good fiction. Just so you know. Like the book, I am subtle.)
- So much telling – we were told everything. There was no subtlety. No nuance. No trusting of the readers to actually grasp the emotional journey that the characters were going through. We must be led through it, holding the author’s hand.
- I approach fiction wanting a story not a sermon so perhaps … the fault lies with me, not managing my expectations. BUT STILL !!! I protest. I PROTEST STRONGLY.
- The main characters felt very clean and cookie-cutter. Too clean and cookie-cutter. Too 2D..
- There were entire chapters of dialogue. This isn’t always a bad thing. But … but I would propose that perhaps the message of the book could have been gotten across with perhaps, say, an article in a magazine, not in a work of fiction.
- There is an absolutely foul section where we are given horribly racist character just to show us how bad he is and then we never see him again. It was degrading and it had no place in the book. It felt like a cheap way of making us hate a character. It was an ugly line of dialogue that did not need to be included for us to get the idea that this guy? = bad. There are no excuses.
- There’s a point where a female character is sharing the gospel with another male character … and she sends him to go speak to another man because ‘men think differently.’
- I’m sorry. I didn’t know that there was a female and male way of talking about faith? Clearly, I must have missed a Bible verse or two.
- Ah yes, the inevitable assault on the female character by a villain. A villain who only exists to Be Evil, by the way. Some people are destined to have nuance and character, some others … are not.
… I should stop here, shouldn’t I? I got through it. Sometimes, whilst I read this, my arms flailed, and my entire body cringed and shrivelled up like a raisin.
Is this the book, I cried, that repelled a thousand ships?!
This book was published in 1996 – perhaps Christian fiction has improved since then? I certainly hope so.
JUST ONE DAMNED THING AFTER ANOTHER
The best thing about this book was that it had dinosaurs (!!!!) and the Library of Alexandra. Also: time-travel.
Unfortunately, the story was … MC joins time-traveling organization. Shenanigans and hi-jinks ensue. One thing happens after another, and the plot feels very squint-and-you’ll-miss-it. A character – who has hitherto displayed no rage – lashes out in anger. I felt startled because I’d imagined that he was calm and sedate and then BLAM! INSTANT GREMLIN!
Also – I thought that this was a YA book. And then there was a particular scene that made me place the book down on the bed and stare into the abyss of air. It was not a YA book. A surprising twist.
This is a first book in a series, and of course, sometimes a series takes a book to hit its stride. This may well be the case. Perhaps I’m being too harsh? However, though I felt the concept was TRULY interesting (DID YOU HEAR THE BIT ABOUT HOW THIS HAS DINOSAURS?!!!!) the characters weren’t on the dinosaurs’ level.
But then, I must ask … what is?
2 thoughts on “books that were not my cup of tea”
I’m with you on A curse so dark and lonely. I was also bored by the characters and the way the story keeps detouring, skimmed toward the end. I don’t think a re-read is in my future but who knows if one feels differently at different times reading the same book?
I still don’t quite get what makes a book a Christian book because I think I have read a few under this category but it just feels just like a regular book. Maybe I missed something?
Just one dammed thing after another – I see-saw whether to read this as I keep reading good reviews that made me want to read it and then I read bad reviews that made me not read it so I’m still deciding.
Have a lovely day.
Yes! I’m glad to find someone who thought the same as me re A Curse.
Badly written Christian books will only remember they are Christian two thirds of way through and then WHAM a conversion scene. I’m all for Christian books but as long as they are a) a story NOT a sermon and b) feel natural and not stilted and my suspension of disbelief remains, er, suspended I guess.
Same re One Damned Thing – I’d say, why not?! It’s clearly getting different responses from readers and so isn’t ‘meh’ and also? Dinosaurs. So. I hope the characters are a little better in the latter books; they could have just been finding their feet? Maybe try it out from the library first?
You too! Thanks so much for stopping by!